Intervention of the Armed Forces in areas of internal security as of the constitutional reform of 2024

Abstract

The constitutional reform of 2024 that expanded the attributions of the Armed Forces in matters of internal security has sparked an intense debate on the limits of such intervention. This paper seeks to delve into the arguments for and against the reform, with special emphasis on the potential risks to human rights that could result from greater military participation in internal security tasks. Through a comparative analysis of normative frameworks, the impact of this reform on the balance between security and human rights is evaluated. The regulations applicable to the new operational scenarios are examined and recommendations are proposed to mitigate the risks identified. Thus, it offers a comprehensive view of the implications of the constitutional reform, contributing to the debate on the role of the Armed Forces in a democratic state and its compatibility with the protection of fundamental rights.